June 26, 2017 | Source: Scott Graham, The Recorder, May 19, 2017

Jury Clears JAMS in Resume-Padding Trial

A San Diego Superior Court jury couldn’t decide if retired appellate justice Sheila Sonenshine made misrepresentations on her JAMS Inc. resume, but they were certain it didn’t cause any harm to venture capitalist Kevin Kinsella.

Following a three-week trial, jurors deadlocked Friday on Kinsella’s allegation that Sonenshine and JAMS falsified her credentials to attract successful business people as clients. But the jury found by an 11-1 vote that Sonenshine’s resume didn’t cause any harm Kinsella claimed to have suffered from having Sonenshine preside over his divorce for 15 months.

Kinsella’s attorneys asked for a mistrial based on an incomplete verdict, but Judge John Meyer denied it. He then dismissed Kinsella’s claims for restitution and an injunction under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act.

JAMS and Sonenshine were grateful for the result. “I’m very appreciative of my legal team’s efforts and dedication, and for the support of my entire family, especially my husband,” said Sonenshine. Ygal Sonenshine had sat by her side throughout the trial, often accompanied by their children.

Long & Levit partner Joseph McMonigle, who led JAMS’ and Sonenshine’s trial team, said his clients are “pleased with the outcome, and look forward to putting this behind them and providing preeminent ADR services.” Partner Jessica MacGregor, associate Andrew Massara and paralegal Graham Helm rounded out Long & Levit’s team, which was supervised by JAMS general counsel Sheri Eisner.

Kinsella’s attorney, Bryan Vess, said his client’s goal had always been to show that JAMS’ advertising was misleading. Because of the jury deadlock on that portion of the verdict, “we never got a ruling on the most important issue of the case, and that’s a bitter pill,” he said.

Meyer did not poll the jury on the deadlock, but juror Judy Richonne said afterward it was 8-4 in favor of JAMS and Sonenshine. She described jurors as fairly locked into that position from the start of deliberations Thursday morning.

A few jurors felt that Sonenshine was evasive at times when testifying, but others felt she was giving the best answers she could, according to Richonne. Meanwhile, “a lot” of jurors felt that Kinsella’s lawsuit was “a witch hunt” prompted by Sonenshine’s orders in his divorce case. In the end, jurors felt they couldn’t connect the allegations to damages, in part because Meyer had excluded much of it from evidence. “We had a very foggy picture” of the damages, Richonne said.

The verdict capped off a three-week trial that’s put a spotlight on how mediators and arbitrators promote themselves. Earlier this spring JAMS added a disclaimer to each of its online bios saying it makes no warranties about accuracy or completeness.

Kinsella, founder of Avalon Ventures, sued JAMS and Sonenshine in 2015. He accused them of falsely representing that Sonenshine founded and ran a private equity fund that invested in women-owned businesses. Sonenshine acknowledged at trial that the fund didn’t raise any outside investment. Instead she and her husband invested $1 million in three companies, though none of them succeeded.

Kinsella also charged that Sonenshine touted her co-founding of an investment bank without disclosing that the bank paid $41 million to settle fraud claims. JAMS and Sonenshine argued that the bank, EquiCo, had generated billions in liquidity and that the suit was filed years after Sonenshine had sold the company.

Practice Area: Lawyers & Judges Defense Group

View All News