Blog Home

Tag: Sanctions

July 30, 2004

Rietveld v. Rosebud Storage Partners, L.P. (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 250

Posted by: jab | Share | Comments Off on Rietveld v. Rosebud Storage Partners, L.P. (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 250

Download Publication The Third District holds that local rules, which include sanctions against counsel, do not conflict with state law and are enforceable. Jon and Carole Rietveld sued their former employer, Rosebud Storage Partners, L.P. (Rosebud).  The case was ordered to judicial arbitration and the arbitrator notified Lyle Havens, counsel for the Rietvelds, that he was […]

Tags:
Categories: Legal Updates

March 29, 2004

Olmstead v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 804

Posted by: jab | Share | Comments Off on Olmstead v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 804

Download Publication The California Supreme Court holds that sanctions under C.C.P. § 128.5 and § 128.7 are mutually exclusive.  Broad sanctions under C.C.P. § 128.5 are not available in any case filed after December 31, 1994. Carleen Olmstead and Cherie Rose “Olmstead” filed suit against an insurance broker, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., and its employee, Vickie Sundgren, […]

Tags:
Categories: Legal Updates