Blog Home

April 5, 2001

Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Law Offices of Conrado Joe Sayas, Jr. 250 F.3d 1234 (9th Cir. (Cal.) 2001)

Posted by: jab | Share | Comments Off on Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Law Offices of Conrado Joe Sayas, Jr. 250 F.3d 1234 (9th Cir. (Cal.) 2001)

Download Publication

The Ninth Circuit has allowed concurrent counsel engaged in a fee dispute with their client to recover prevailing party attorneys’ fees when the attorneys represent each other in the fee dispute.  When a fee contract provides for recovery of attorneys’ fees by the prevailing party, attorneys may recover fees paid to their own counsel.  The fees must be incurred in the context of a valid attorney-client relationship where the interests of the attorney and the client are distinct.  The California Supreme Court holds a corporation may recover attorneys’ fees for the reasonable value of the services of in-house counsel.

The Law Offices of Conrado Joe Sayas, Jr. (“Sayas”) and Quisenberry & Kabateck, LLP (“Q&B”) jointly represented the Desais in an insurance bad faith action.  Sayas, Q&B and the Desais had entered into a contingency fee agreement that contained a prevailing party attorneys’ fees clause in the event of a dispute between the lawyers and the clients.  After their insurance bad faith case was settled, the Desais became dissatisfied with the representation of Sayas and Q&B and refused to honor the agreement.  Sayas and Q&B moved to recover attorney fees and costs under the contingency fee agreement.

Sayas and Q&B successfully moved for summary judgment on their fee dispute and were awarded $333,267 collectively in attorney fees and costs. Sayas and Q&B then moved for attorney fees under California Civil Code §1717 for fees they incurred in prosecuting the fee dispute.  The district court awarded Q&B $45,653, and Sayas $16,991.

The court allowed each attorney to recover its attorneys’ fees because Sayas and Q&B each retained the other.  The fees were actually incurred, which was evidenced by an obligation by each to pay attorneys’ fees to the other.  An attorney-client relationship existed with distinct interests between the attorney and the client.

 

Tags:
Categories: Legal Updates

Comments are closed.